Another Solid Quarter by Lemonade
Taking a Look at Lemonade's (LMND) Earnings Report.
I've transitioned to exclusively logging my weekly activity and tracking my portfolio in real-time on Savvy Trader.
For those not yet in the loop, I invite you to join me on this journey. Subscribe using the link below to gain direct insights:
By subscribing, you'll engage directly with me regarding specific companies, access my performance in real-time (with data starting under a year), and get detailed views of my investments, real-time trading actions, cash positions, and more. This move is driven by my commitment to transparency. I believe that sharing my analytical insights and the reasoning behind my investment choices offers immense value, empowering you with the information you need to make informed decisions.
Lemonade Outperforms Expectations Amid Growth & Rising Costs
Lemonade (LMND) released its Q3 earnings on October 30, 2024. The results showcased significant achievements in revenue growth and customer expansion, while also highlighting challenges related to increased operational expenses. From this, the stock spiked nearly 30%.
Key Financial Highlights
Revenue Surpasses Guidance: The company reported revenue of $136.6M, exceeding management's guidance of $124M to $126M and marking a 19% YoY increase from $114.5M.
Gross Earned Premium (GEP): GEP reached $213M, surpassing the anticipated range of $208M to $210M, a 23% increase compared to $173.2M in the same quarter last year.
In Force Premium (IFP): IFP grew to $889.1M, beating guidance by 1.4% and reflecting a 24% YoY growth from $719M.
Net Cash Flow: Achieved a positive net cash flow of $48M, a substantial improvement from $3M in the previous year.
Adjusted EBITDA Loss: Reported an adjusted EBITDA loss of $49M, which was $7M better than estimates and $8M better than guidance.
Understanding Lemonade's Digital-First Model
For anybody new to the Lemonade idea, they operate entirely online, offering renters, homeowners, pet, car, and life insurance through a streamlined digital platform. By eliminating traditional intermediaries, the company reduces costs and enhances customer experience. Advanced AI tools, which they refer to as their customer cortex, facilitate customer interactions and claims processing, enabling rapid adaptation and operational efficiency.
The company's strategy focuses on improving profit margins by lowering loss ratios and expanding into insurance lines less exposed to catastrophic events, like pet and car insurance. Technological innovation and data integration are central to LMND's approach, providing a competitive edge in the insurance market. Initially, this cortex was quite flawed and needed data to refine and improve. Now, it has reached a level of precision where underwriting is approaching sustained profitability.
Quarterly Achievements and Operational Challenges
Revenue and Premium Growth: The impressive revenue and GEP figures highlight successful customer acquisition and an effective product mix strategy. Revenue estimates were beaten by 8%, and guidance was surpassed by 9.3%.
Improved Loss Ratios: The gross loss ratio improved by 10 points from the previous year to 73%, indicating better risk management and operational improvements. Lower loss ratios are favorable, as they signify reduced claims relative to premiums earned.
Operational Efficiency: Despite a 24% increase in the customer base, Lemonade reduced its headcount, showcasing the efficiency gains from its technology-driven operations.
Diversification Strategy: The share of IFP from pet and auto insurance rose to 44%, aligning with the company's goal to diversify its offerings and reduce exposure to catastrophic risks.
However, the quarter also presented challenges:
Increased Operating Expenses: Operating expenses grew by 27% YoY to $124.5M due to heightened growth initiatives, impacting profitability (growth spend).
Net Loss: The net loss stood at $67.7M, slightly below expectations, reflecting the tension between rapid growth and cost management.
Adjusted EBITDA Loss: The adjusted EBITDA loss increased by 22% from the previous year, highlighting ongoing investments in growth at the expense of short-term profitability.
Guidance and Valuation Outlook
Q4 Projections: Revenue guidance for the fourth quarter met estimates, while EBITDA guidance missed expectations by $6M, partly due to anticipated impacts from recent severe weather events.
Annual Guidance Raised: LMND increased its annual revenue and GEP guidance, attributing the adjustment to strong Q3 performance.
Path to Profitability: The company reiterated its expectation to achieve adjusted EBITDA profitability by 2026, emphasizing a commitment to long-term financial health.
Investment Considerations: LMND remains a high-risk, high-reward investment opportunity, given its ambitious growth plans and the speculative nature of its future profitability.
Strengthening the Balance Sheet
Robust Cash Position: With $979M in cash and equivalents and no debt, Lemonade maintains a strong liquidity position.
Positive Operating Cash Flow: The company turned operating cash flow positive this quarter, reinforcing its trajectory toward positive FCF.
Resilience to Catastrophic Events: Despite expected hurricane-related losses, liquidity is anticipated to remain a strength, showcasing the company's ability to withstand unforeseen events.
Strategic Initiatives and Future Focus
LMND is advancing its AI initiatives and synthetic agents to enhance customer interactions and expand its insurance offerings, particularly in car insurance, where significant growth potential exists. The company emphasizes scaling efficiently and securely, with plans to moderate growth spending while enhancing operational efficiencies.
Management highlights the importance of:
Expanding Insurance Territory: Pursuing IFP growth by entering untapped regions and markets.
Improving Loss Ratios: Continuing efforts to lower loss ratios through better risk assessment and management.
Balancing Growth and Costs: Managing operational expenses to move toward profitability without sacrificing growth momentum.
My Take
This was an excellent quarter, though we’re still quite a ways from seeing the full payoff of this investment. However, the company continues to progress steadily toward profitability. As someone who shifted from a bear at IPO levels to a bull in 2022, it’s been a bumpy ride, and it’s crucial for investors to keep in mind the scale of what this team is trying to achieve—it will require patience. Overall, I’m very pleased with their performance. It’s worth noting that their increased growth spending inflates some metrics, but it appears to be driving strong results. If we stay on course, achieve sustainable underwriting profitability, and keep executing, this has the potential to be a big winner.
One thing I would like to point out, which seems to be another misconstrued bear argument, is their net loss ratio in comparison with their gross loss ratio. Bears are arguing that the rising net loss ratio increasing while their gross loss ratio is decreasing points to a concerning sign for an insurance company (LMND) because it suggests they’re keeping more risk on their own books, which could lead to greater losses if claims spike unexpectedly. For those that don’t follow, insurance companies rely on reinsurance as a safety net to smooth out big fluctuations in claims. By choosing to retain more risk (either due to higher reinsurance costs or a strategic choice to save on reinsurance), they say (bears) LMND is now more exposed if unexpected claims come in. It’s a cost-saving move in the short term, but it does increase financial risk because the company is more directly responsible for paying out claims. You know, ideally, you’d want to see both gross and net loss ratios improving together, because it indicates a well-protected and efficient operation. When gross losses improve but net losses rise, it often signals they may be taking on more risk than they can handle comfortably. This is all accurate, but it lacks the context specific to LMND's situation, which management has emphasized.
The divergence between LMND's net loss ratio (which increased to 81%) and its gross loss ratio (which decreased to 73%) stems from adjustments in the company's reinsurance arrangements. Here’s why:
Reinsurance Ceding: LMND relies on reinsurance to offload some of its risk. The gross loss ratio measures losses before accounting for reinsurance, while the net loss ratio considers the cost after reinsurance. If LMND ceded a smaller portion of premiums to reinsurers this quarter, they would retain more of the risk, leading to higher losses reflected in the net loss ratio.
Reinsurance Costs or Structure Changes: Any increase in reinsurance costs or adjustments to their reinsurance contracts (retaining more risk in certain areas) could also raise the net loss ratio. While gross losses improved through lower claims or more effective underwriting, increased retention of those losses by LMND—rather than passing them to reinsurers—would mean a higher net loss impact (this is the primary contributor).
Shift in Product Mix: LMND’s growing product diversification affects loss ratios differently. Products like pet insurance, while less impacted by CAT events, can carry higher frequency and variability in claims that influence net losses disproportionately if not fully reinsured.
I don’t mean to add fuel to the fire by challenging the bearish perspective, but if you read the SEC filings, listen to the calls, or review the shareholder letters, this information is already clear. The increase in the net loss ratio is largely due to higher reinsurance costs/structural changes in their reinsurance approach. LMND has been adjusting the terms of its reinsurance agreements, by retaining more risk (to save on reinsurance costs) and by altering coverage to be more selective in what’s reinsured. These adjustments can reduce expenses on reinsurance but result in LMND shouldering more of the financial burden for claims, hence the higher net loss ratio. Which is a short-term impact NOT a long-term lingering one. This is actually a common approach when reinsurance becomes costly or when companies feel like they can internally manage certain risks, but it does require careful oversight to avoid overexposure.
Personally, I plan to hold onto my shares in the company. I’m still weighing whether to add at these levels or wait for more stability—it's a tricky decision, but I’m committed to staying within my investment process and sticking to my rules. Overall, it was another solid quarter, and I’m looking forward to seeing if they can maintain this momentum!