Rocket Lab Lands Massive Government Contract
Taking a Look at Rocket Lab (RKLB).
Big Announcement!
I’m excited to let you know that I’ll be merging with Pierce Capital Research as their Lead Analyst. Pierce Capital Research is a research-based equities securities firm, not an investment advisory firm. Here, we’ll provide premium research on our coverage ecosystem for a fee, including exclusive quarterly, annual, and business update reports. We’ll also offer a Portfolio Dashboard featuring real-time holdings and an Intrinsic Value Tracker, which highlights our modeled “Margin of Safety” for each business.
We plan to launch toward the end of April/beginning of May, and this will be open to everyone. For the first couple of months, we’ll have discounted monthly and annual plans available. This platform will feature a high-end, user-friendly interface with a secure portal for subscribers, ensuring a top-tier experience.
Our coverage ecosystem currently includes more than 20 companies—ASML, AST SpaceMobile, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Avita Medical, Boston Omaha, Coherus BioSciences, dLocal, Global Crossing Airlines, Lemonade, Lockheed Martin, MicroStrategy (Strategy), NVIDIA, Planet 13 Holdings, Relay Therapeutics, Rocket Lab, Sky Harbour Group, SoFi Technologies, STAG Industrial, Taiwan Semiconductor, TransMedics Group, Verses AI, and the S&P 500—and we plan to expand further as our internal bandwidth grows.
I’ll share more details as we approach launch so you can decide whether our services are right for you.
As for this newsletter, it will remain active and free but be rebranded under PCR. In the meantime, I’ll continue releasing articles under my name until the merger is fully complete.
Rocket Lab’s $5.6B Space Force Contract Marks a Strategic Turning Point
Rocket Lab’s (RKLB) recent contract award from the U.S. Space Force, with a potential value of up to $5.6B, represents a milestone in the company’s evolution. This firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) award allows RKLB to compete for some of the Pentagon’s highest-priority satellite launch missions through 2029. In effect, the small-launch specialist is now on the roster of approved launch providers for U.S. national security missions, joining an elite group alongside industry heavyweights like SpaceX, United Launch Alliance (ULA), Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin, and newcomer Stoke Space. The deal is far more than just a dollar figure; it fundamentally shifts RKLB’s business trajectory, boosting its credibility and opening the door to larger opportunities.
The U.S. Space Force selected RKLB as one of five companies for Phase 3 of its National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program, an effort to ensure the military has multiple reliable launch options for critical payloads. Under this NSSL “Lane 1” contract, RKLB will offer launch services using its forthcoming Neutron rocket for U.S. defense and intelligence missions.
Key aspects of the deal include:
Scope & Duration: It is a 5-year contract framework (with an option to extend to 2034) during which RKLB and the other providers can be assigned launch missions. The ordering period runs through June 2029, with at least 30 missions expected to be awarded in this timeframe. Each mission will be competed among the approved providers, meaning they must bid for each launch opportunity rather than receiving a lump sum of work upfront.
Contract Value: The total ceiling value of all missions in Lane 1 is up to $5.6B. This figure isn’t a guaranteed payout to Rocket Lab, but rather the combined value of launch orders the Space Force plans to allocate across the pool of providers. They will earn revenue as it wins individual launch task orders.
Services Provided: RKLB’s role is to deliver national security satellites to orbit on Neutron, its medium-lift rocket currently in advanced development. Missions will likely involve launching military or intelligence satellites to low Earth orbit and possibly mid-range orbits, including deployments of new constellations or technology demonstrators. To start, RKLB has actually received a $5M initial task order to perform a capabilities assessment and refine its “tailored mission assurance” approach for these sensitive launches. In practice, this means they will work with Space Force officials to prove that its launch processes and quality controls can meet the stringent requirements of national security payloads (which I don’t see them having issues with).
This Lane 1 contract is considered an “entry level” track for emerging launch providers. It is structured to bring in new competitors and handle missions that can tolerate slightly higher risk or have more flexible timing. In securing a Lane 1 spot, they have indeed earned a chance to launch less sensitive, but still high-priority, Space Force payloads, demonstrating its capabilities before moving on to the most critical national security missions. The contract’s structure shows that RKLB is not guaranteed work unless it performs: the company must compete for each mission against other approved providers on factors like reliability, cost, and schedule. In other words, they have gained a ticket to the game, now it must prove itself on the field. So, there is not much margin for error anymore in the big leagues.
From Small Launches to a Major Contender in Space?
Winning this contract does elevate their standing within the space launch ecosystem. Until now, the company was best known for its Electron rocket, a light launcher dedicated to putting small satellites into orbit. Electron has made over 60 launches to date, establishing them as a reliable player in the small-sat market. However, the national security arena has traditionally been the domain of much larger rockets from much larger players. By being selected for the NSSL program, Rocket Lab is now positioned shoulder-to-shoulder with America’s premier launch providers for defense missions. This is a remarkable leap for a company that started launching tiny payloads out of New Zealand just a few years ago.
The inclusion of RKLB and fellow newcomer Stoke Space in the Space Force’s roster reflects a broader strategy: the military wants more competition/innovation in launch. In other words, their presence is expected to boost capacity and resiliency for U.S. launch needs, ensuring the Pentagon isn’t solely reliant on just one or two big providers. There is a real demand for additional launch options, currently SpaceX dominates the market for medium-to-heavy launches, while ULA is transitioning to its new Vulcan rocket and Blue Origin’s New Glenn has yet to fly. By entering this arena, RKLB helps provide that diversity. However, without being pessimistic, there might be bias with SpaceX winning majority of these bids.
Neutron: The Key to Rocket Lab’s Next Phase
Central to fulfilling this contract –- and indeed to Rocket Lab’s future –- is the Neutron rocket. Neutron is RKLB’s new medium-lift launch vehicle, designed to handle significantly larger payloads than Electron. It will be the workhorse that actually carries out the Space Force missions RKLB wins.
Designed for 13-ton payloads, Neutron can lift on the order of 50× more mass to orbit than Electron. This massive increase in capability transitions the company firmly into the medium-to-heavy launch class. Neutron is also being built as a reusable rocket from day one, featuring a carbon-composite body and innovative design. It will be powered by RKLB’s new Archimedes engines and launch from the company’s developing pad at Wallops Island, Virginia. In short, it is a modern, cost-effective medium launcher intended to compete on performance, price, and flexibility.
The Space Force contract is essentially a bet on Neutron’s success. When the military added them to the program, it did so knowing Neutron was still unflown/successful/reliable –- with the understanding that the rocket must prove itself quickly. RKLB has slated Neutron’s maiden flight for late 2025. Achieving that timeline is critical and really will either make or break this company. According to the Space Force, they will be fully eligible to compete for actual NSSL missions only after Neutron conducts a successful test launch. This puts a lot of pressure on the Neutron development program over the next 12–18 months.
Neutron’s performance and reliability will ultimately determine whether they can truly scale into this next phase. The first few launches of Neutron will be watched closely by the Space Force and the entire industry. I've said this before, but it's worth repeating: we should assume a few setbacks in the initial launches and avoid writing them off too quickly if things don’t go perfectly at first. That said, we do need to be reasonable as investors, if Neutron ultimately proves unsuccessful or unreliable, we’ll have to revisit our overall thesis for the company. Ultimately, they need to demonstrate that Neutron can deliver its promised lift capacity and do so with a high degree of reliability and mission assurance. All eyes are on Neutron.